<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Increase the Max Concurrent Port Connections on Your Network</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.hackernotcracker.com/2008-08/increase-the-max-concurrent-port-connections-on-your-network.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.hackernotcracker.com/2008-08/increase-the-max-concurrent-port-connections-on-your-network.html</link>
	<description>mostly white-hat hacker stuff</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Jan 2012 15:42:36 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Adam</title>
		<link>http://www.hackernotcracker.com/2008-08/increase-the-max-concurrent-port-connections-on-your-network.html/comment-page-1#comment-137878</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Nov 2011 08:49:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hackernotcracker.com/2008-08/increase-the-max-concurrent-port-connections-on-your-network.html#comment-137878</guid>
		<description>#fail article. Most consumer grade routers support somewhere around 200 concurrent connections. Asking the applications to use more than that will make it all slower.

The Windows setting is not for number of concurrent connections but number of half open connections, which is not the same thing.

Lastly, Firefox concurrency is set to the amount in the configuration because some web servers don&#039;t allow a higher number of concurrent connections.

Even though the article is old, it was as wrong then as it is wrong now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#fail article. Most consumer grade routers support somewhere around 200 concurrent connections. Asking the applications to use more than that will make it all slower.</p>
<p>The Windows setting is not for number of concurrent connections but number of half open connections, which is not the same thing.</p>
<p>Lastly, Firefox concurrency is set to the amount in the configuration because some web servers don&#8217;t allow a higher number of concurrent connections.</p>
<p>Even though the article is old, it was as wrong then as it is wrong now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: allan</title>
		<link>http://www.hackernotcracker.com/2008-08/increase-the-max-concurrent-port-connections-on-your-network.html/comment-page-1#comment-54427</link>
		<dc:creator>allan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Aug 2008 19:01:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hackernotcracker.com/2008-08/increase-the-max-concurrent-port-connections-on-your-network.html#comment-54427</guid>
		<description>cool article!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>cool article!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fuq fios</title>
		<link>http://www.hackernotcracker.com/2008-08/increase-the-max-concurrent-port-connections-on-your-network.html/comment-page-1#comment-53847</link>
		<dc:creator>fuq fios</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Aug 2008 08:44:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hackernotcracker.com/2008-08/increase-the-max-concurrent-port-connections-on-your-network.html#comment-53847</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d &quot;upgrade&quot; to fios from 15 mbps TimeWarner if:

+ they would allow mutiple &quot;TAs&quot; on one account
+ didn&#039;t restrict me to using only their smtp server
+ tv service didn&#039;t STEAL bandwidth from my internet connection
+ didn&#039;t make it an uphill battle to have a &quot;dry loop&quot; install
+ billed monthly: to encourage better customer service
+ didn&#039;t cost more for the same f&#039;ing thing
+ didn&#039;t use evil, smallER netblock, geoip registration like TWC</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d &#8220;upgrade&#8221; to fios from 15 mbps TimeWarner if:</p>
<p>+ they would allow mutiple &#8220;TAs&#8221; on one account<br />
+ didn&#8217;t restrict me to using only their smtp server<br />
+ tv service didn&#8217;t STEAL bandwidth from my internet connection<br />
+ didn&#8217;t make it an uphill battle to have a &#8220;dry loop&#8221; install<br />
+ billed monthly: to encourage better customer service<br />
+ didn&#8217;t cost more for the same f&#8217;ing thing<br />
+ didn&#8217;t use evil, smallER netblock, geoip registration like TWC</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

