Comments on: Connect Multiple, Simultaneous, Concurrent Remote Desktop Sessions

By: mike

mike — Tue, 09 Jun 2009 07:59:12 +0000

If it works it will be great, accessing a shared folder is great but say you have three people want to run a specific programme that is only available on the host computer at the same time…from different locations…then this is great for that.

By: billtoi

billtoi — Thu, 19 Mar 2009 23:48:54 +0000

Patch worked like a charm. Thanks.

By: Iain

Iain — Tue, 29 Jul 2008 23:35:55 +0000

I thank you for this advice. I preferred the “automating the process in a simple installation file” option.
To complete the process I had to set the server pc to allow remote sessions to connect and create an administrator user with password and (because I was on local LAN) make the same Workgroup name on both machines to see the Terminal Server pc from the remote pc. I was able to logon directly and via Remote Desktop Connection.
As to why:- thin clients are cheaper to buy and run power wise hence greener.

By: Troy

Troy — Thu, 24 Jul 2008 20:27:31 +0000

There’s also more resources on a computer than the disk drive. If you explain how to use a file share to have two users share the new, dual-core CPU, I’ll agree this is article is garbage.

By: nick

nick — Mon, 21 Jul 2008 13:43:29 +0000

RDP is gives you faster performance with databases than accessing them as mapped drives over VPN. That’s what makes this different.

By: tim

tim — Fri, 18 Jul 2008 18:07:32 +0000

This article is complete garbage. Why on earth would you use multiple sessions with RDP when you could have the users access the files via a simple share?

By: unknown

unknown — Sun, 08 Jun 2008 21:37:11 +0000

Hi i need ur help about the connect, i have 2 desktop in my room and my bro’s room. but 2 desktop can’t work at the same time. So how can i connect to let 2 desktop can have internet to online at same time?plz explain clearly for me how to connect, thxx

By: Abhijit Naik

Abhijit Naik — Fri, 30 May 2008 06:18:05 +0000

Tried but not working, need to find other solution. Also wasted 2 hours in trying this trick.

By: austin

austin — Tue, 03 Apr 2007 09:16:24 +0000

How is this any more practical than just mapping out each folder as a drive on target machine? I don’t see the practicality, you’re still getting to view what you need to, but you aren’t clogging the bandwith of the network.