<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Connect to T-Mobile Hotspots for Free (Technically) Without Vista</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.hackernotcracker.com/2007-02/connect-to-t-mobile-hotspots-for-free-technically-without-vista.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.hackernotcracker.com/2007-02/connect-to-t-mobile-hotspots-for-free-technically-without-vista.html</link>
	<description>mostly white-hat hacker stuff</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Jan 2012 15:42:36 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: DManzaluni</title>
		<link>http://www.hackernotcracker.com/2007-02/connect-to-t-mobile-hotspots-for-free-technically-without-vista.html/comment-page-1#comment-63184</link>
		<dc:creator>DManzaluni</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Dec 2008 04:47:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hackernotcracker.com/2007-02/connect-to-t-mobile-hotspots-for-free-technically-without-vista.html#comment-63184</guid>
		<description>I see no recent postings on this: Why would it work when they MUST check to see whether you are a PAID UP member at t-mobile, as opposed to just someone who connected up to a free trial??

Lots of these softwares seem to have free trials, doesn\&#039;t this posting sort of assume no one ever authorises access by reference to whether you are current or not?

Am I missing something somewhere or is this why no one reports that this method actually works?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I see no recent postings on this: Why would it work when they MUST check to see whether you are a PAID UP member at t-mobile, as opposed to just someone who connected up to a free trial??</p>
<p>Lots of these softwares seem to have free trials, doesn\&#8217;t this posting sort of assume no one ever authorises access by reference to whether you are current or not?</p>
<p>Am I missing something somewhere or is this why no one reports that this method actually works?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Korgrin</title>
		<link>http://www.hackernotcracker.com/2007-02/connect-to-t-mobile-hotspots-for-free-technically-without-vista.html/comment-page-1#comment-49178</link>
		<dc:creator>Korgrin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2008 15:32:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hackernotcracker.com/2007-02/connect-to-t-mobile-hotspots-for-free-technically-without-vista.html#comment-49178</guid>
		<description>heh, just ran across this, so posting a bit out of date, but oh well... sounds like they must have registered MAC address once they decided someone had a Vista machine, so you probably could have just gotten a friend with a Vista machine to set up a username &amp; password while temporarily spoofing their mac (using SMAC or just registry edits) to match your wireless adapter. If you had such friend.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>heh, just ran across this, so posting a bit out of date, but oh well&#8230; sounds like they must have registered MAC address once they decided someone had a Vista machine, so you probably could have just gotten a friend with a Vista machine to set up a username &amp; password while temporarily spoofing their mac (using SMAC or just registry edits) to match your wireless adapter. If you had such friend.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

